![]() ![]() It is true that you do need a good to very good string library to work with, but I am kind of getting the feeling that the attitude is if I have a great string library I can do great work or orchestral pieces, ![]() Have not got spitfire but from reviews I can say they are pretty decent strings, I wonder if the Thread should be called, Us Vs a decent String library, Not orchestral, but an occasion where, like the new pricing on Sable/SCS, SF have a very competitive price. Talking of deals, I really dig eDNA Earth. But! Were I a little richer, I'd certainly put the BML on my SSDs. ![]() And I'd recommend EW for anyone on a budget (the price these days is an insane deal). Given my current setup, I'd use EW for complex music, and SF for anything more. But oh boy, if Spitfire do for all their instruments the range of legatos in SCS. success at playing fast lines) was a little disappointing. My BML Horns were my last orchestral Spitfire purchase, and the relative inflexibility of their legatos (viz. I should note though that some of the newer BML products from Spitfire appear to have very good flexibility for playing complex lines (e.g. I also find it remarkably intuitive to use - the legato-speed-by-velocity is something I really wish we saw in other libraries. There has been very, very little that I've seen it unable to do (measured trills, so to speak, being the one exception off the top of my head - but that's true of almost every library). I wrote this sketch with Loegria, and despite my best efforts with fuller, more complex libraries from other debts, I continue to prefer it:īut I have yet to come across a more ready-to-roll orchestra than the Hollywood series. I find the sound of Spitfire's samples to be very musical in and of themselves. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |